Mmcp.market

Head to head

Cite Caddy vs jCodemunch MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Cite Caddydk.herbertkokholm.citecaddy/cite-caddy
A
No reviews yet

Remote MCP server for full read/write access to a Zotero library

Full listing
jCodemunch MCPio.github.jgravelle/jcodemunch-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Token-efficient code exploration via tree-sitter AST parsing. 70+ languages, 86-99% token savings.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cite Caddy (92/100 against 66). Cite Caddy is hosted and callable through the gateway; jCodemunch MCP runs on your own machine. jCodemunch MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 Cite CaddyjCodemunch MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C66/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars02.7k
Downloads / week–6.0k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-172026-09-19
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Cite Caddy vs Azure MCP ServerCite Caddy vs SemioticCite Caddy vs World MonitorCite Caddy vs NetdataCite Caddy vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers