Head to head
Twitter Signal vs Bluesky
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Twitter Signal
Bio.github.ciinkwia/twitter-signal-mcpNo reviews yet
Live X/Twitter search, profiles, leads, pain points, bot checks, AI digests. Paid per call, x402.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (80 and 86 out of 100). Bluesky is hosted and callable through the gateway; Twitter Signal runs on your own machine.
| Twitter Signal | Bluesky | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 243 | 178 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 7 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |