Head to head
Churnkey vs Currency Minor Unit Lint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and manage Churnkey cancel flows, retention metrics, and payment recovery
Full listing
No reviews yet
Finds the money lines that send the wrong amount to a payment API: the x100 that charges 100x in JPY
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Churnkey (100/100 against 89). Churnkey is hosted and callable through the gateway; Currency Minor Unit Lint runs on your own machine. Churnkey has noticeably more public adoption.
| Churnkey | Currency Minor Unit Lint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 22 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |