Mmcp.market

Head to head

CHRP EPI Authority vs Microsoft 365 MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

CHRP EPI Authorityio.github.chrp-bass/chrp-epi-authority
C
No reviews yet

Read-only public EPI definitions, claim boundaries, use cases, and canonical sources.

Full listing
Microsoft 365 MCP Serverio.github.Softeria/ms-365-mcp-server
B
No reviews yet

Interact with Microsoft 365 and Office services through the Microsoft Graph API.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Microsoft 365 MCP Server (75/100 against 67). CHRP EPI Authority is hosted and callable through the gateway; Microsoft 365 MCP Server runs on your own machine. Microsoft 365 MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 CHRP EPI AuthorityMicrosoft 365 MCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100B75/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–983
Downloads / week–41k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools8—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

CHRP EPI Authority vs Azure MCP ServerCHRP EPI Authority vs SemioticCHRP EPI Authority vs World MonitorCHRP EPI Authority vs NetdataCHRP EPI Authority vs jCodemunch MCPAll Everything else servers