Head to head
Viator vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Viator
Bio.github.chrischall/viator-mcpNo reviews yet
Search Viator tours and activities — products, availability, attractions, destinations.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Source-timestamped energy data and reviewed OilPriceAPI product facts for MCP clients.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 85 out of 100). MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Viator | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.5k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 10 | 36 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |