Head to head
jobber-mcp vs mcp-grafana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
jobber-mcp
Aio.github.chrischall/jobber-mcpNo reviews yet
Read the Jobber Client Hub your service providers share: appointments, invoices and quotes
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 98 out of 100). mcp-grafana is hosted and callable through the gateway; jobber-mcp runs on your own machine. mcp-grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| jobber-mcp | mcp-grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 3.5k |
| Downloads / week | 437 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |