Head to head
Flightaware vs Fly Where To?
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Flightaware
Bio.github.chrischall/flightaware-mcpNo reviews yet
Live flight tracking and aviation data via FlightAware AeroAPI (flights, airports, alerts).
Full listing
No reviews yet
Worldwide nonstop flight routes from Wikipedia: airports, destinations, connections, airlines.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Flightaware (83/100 against 69). Fly Where To? is hosted and callable through the gateway; Flightaware runs on your own machine. Flightaware has noticeably more public adoption.
| Flightaware | Fly Where To? | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 207 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 8 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |