Head to head
Forency vs Signals
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Detect the tech stack behind any website: CMS, ecommerce, analytics, CRM, payments, hosting.
Full listingSignals
Ccom.rivalsweeper/signalsNo reviews yet
Beta. Pay-per-call eCommerce competitive intel for AI agents: pricing, promos, readiness & more.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Forency (91/100 against 67). Forency has noticeably more public adoption.
| Forency | Signals | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 21 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 10 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-08-28 | — |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |