Head to head
Slid Phi Labs vs Patchloom
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
CuNi exactness, Chamber two-key JSON, Agent-Rider. Lab signup, agent keys, x402 catalog.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Agent-safe structured edits: JSON/YAML/TOML/md/AST, dry-run, batch/tx. Not a filesystem MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Patchloom (75/100 against 57). Slid Phi Labs is hosted and callable through the gateway; Patchloom runs on your own machine. Patchloom has noticeably more public adoption.
| Slid Phi Labs | Patchloom | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 17 |
| Downloads / week | – | 470 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 42 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |