Head to head
CEDRUS vs World Monitor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
CEDRUS
Bio.github.cedrus-mcp/cedrus-mcpNo reviews yet
Reasoning scaffolding that supercharges your small AI: an argument-mapping MCP server
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 75 tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours World Monitor (95/100 against 72). World Monitor is hosted and callable through the gateway; CEDRUS runs on your own machine. World Monitor has noticeably more public adoption.
| CEDRUS | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B72/100 | A95/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 87k |
| Downloads / week | 176 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |