Head to head
Hypermnesia vs Grafana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Persistent memory for AI agents — 36 cited neuroscience mechanisms, local-first, hybrid retrieval.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Grafana (98/100 against 66). Grafana is hosted and callable through the gateway; Hypermnesia runs on your own machine. Grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| Hypermnesia | Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C66/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 72 | 3.5k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |