Head to head
Hipocampo MCP vs Marm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Hipocampo MCP
Cio.github.carrasquelalex1/hipocampoNo reviews yet
Bilingual dual memory with SSC for AI agents. Semantic search, embeddings, profiles.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Universal MCP Server with advanced AI memory capabilities and semantic search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Marm (92/100 against 57). Hipocampo MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Marm runs on your own machine. Marm has noticeably more public adoption.
| Hipocampo MCP | Marm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 383 |
| Downloads / week | – | 532 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 37 | — |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |