Mmcp.market

Head to head

Routing Services Courier vs Total Agent Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Routing Services Courierio.github.Carlos-VLab/routing-services-courier
C
No reviews yet

Pay-per-call ($0.01 USDC) model-routing for AI coding agents: which LLM to call, cost vs. quality.

Full listing
Total Agent Memoryio.github.vbcherepanov/total-agent-memory
A
No reviews yet

Persistent local memory for coding agents: temporal knowledge graph, procedural and episodic recall

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Total Agent Memory (85/100 against 67). Routing Services Courier is hosted and callable through the gateway; Total Agent Memory runs on your own machine. Total Agent Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Routing Services CourierTotal Agent Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100A85/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–68
Downloads / week–166
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools176
Write actions—7
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Routing Services Courier vs AuscaRouting Services Courier vs BridgeNode MCPRouting Services Courier vs MaginaryRouting Services Courier vs Trusty SquireRouting Services Courier vs ImageAll AI and agents servers