Head to head
Routing Services Courier vs Local Rag
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Routing Services Courier
Cio.github.Carlos-VLab/routing-services-courierNo reviews yet
Pay-per-call ($0.01 USDC) model-routing for AI coding agents: which LLM to call, cost vs. quality.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Local Rag (92/100 against 67). Routing Services Courier is hosted and callable through the gateway; Local Rag runs on your own machine. Local Rag has noticeably more public adoption.
| Routing Services Courier | Local Rag | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 400 |
| Downloads / week | – | 4.8k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 1 | 9 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |