Head to head
Cerebro vs CRA AGENT
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Cerebro
Cio.github.Carlos-VLab/cerebroNo reviews yet
Pay-per-call ($0.25 USDC) project cost estimator: modules + cheapest model mix that clears quality.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Lets an agent pay for x402 APIs in USDC on Arc, under a spending policy it cannot change.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CRA AGENT (89/100 against 67). Cerebro is hosted and callable through the gateway; CRA AGENT runs on your own machine. CRA AGENT has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cerebro | CRA AGENT | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 80 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 1 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |