Head to head
Capacities vs Smithsonian
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Connect an AI assistant to a Capacities space (objects, daily notes, search).
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search 14.5M Smithsonian Open Access objects, get CC0 images, find cross-collection connections.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Smithsonian (93/100 against 70). Smithsonian has noticeably more public adoption.
| Capacities | Smithsonian | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 180 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |