Head to head
Ibanforge vs Sepa Pain001 Reject Lint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Check the bank behind an IBAN before you pay: bank-code check, BIC with source, bank-level sanctions
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (84 and 89 out of 100). Ibanforge is hosted and callable through the gateway; Sepa Pain001 Reject Lint runs on your own machine. Ibanforge has noticeably more public adoption.
| Ibanforge | Sepa Pain001 Reject Lint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.0k | 245 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |