Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-device vs ctxlint

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-deviceio.github.callstack/agent-device
C
No reviews yet

MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps

Full listing
ctxlintio.github.YawLabs/ctxlint
A
No reviews yet

Lint AI agent context files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, etc.) against your actual codebase

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ctxlint (91/100 against 55). agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-devicectxlint
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100A91/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars4.7k10
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-device vs ha-mcpagent-device vs mcpagent-device vs IWEagent-device vs fiori-mcp-serveragent-device vs mcp-local-ragAll AI and agents servers