Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-device vs Quesen Deterministic Agent Decision Layer

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-deviceio.github.callstack/agent-device
C
No reviews yet

MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps

Full listing
Quesen Deterministic Agent Decision Layerio.github.Shxnque/quesen
A
No reviews yet

Deterministic decision layer for autonomous agents: reproducible PROCEED/REVIEW/SKIP verdicts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Quesen Deterministic Agent Decision Layer (88/100 against 55). Quesen Deterministic Agent Decision Layer is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-deviceQuesen Deterministic Agent Decision Layer
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100A88/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars4.7k2
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—5
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-device vs ha-mcpagent-device vs IWEagent-device vs fiori-mcp-serveragent-device vs mcp-local-ragagent-device vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers