Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-device vs Provider Trust — Verify a Source or Provider

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-deviceio.github.callstack/agent-device
A
No reviews yet

MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps

Full listing
Provider Trust — Verify a Source or Providercom.scriptmasterlabs/provider-trust
C
No reviews yet

Verify a source or provider before an AI agent trusts it. Evidence only; unknown stays unknown.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours agent-device (94/100 against 69). Provider Trust — Verify a Source or Provider is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-deviceProvider Trust — Verify a Source or Provider
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA94/100C69/100
AdoptionWidely usedNew
GitHub stars4.7k
Downloads / week118k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools16
Write actions
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT
Last release2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons