Head to head
agent-device vs Patronus Security
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps
Full listing
No reviews yet
Scan text, documents, websites, and MCP metadata for prompt injection and sensitive-data risks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours agent-device (94/100 against 57). Patronus Security is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.
| agent-device | Patronus Security | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | New |
| GitHub stars | 4.7k | – |
| Downloads / week | 118k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |