Head to head
agent-device vs Myncellium Paid MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps
Full listingMyncellium Paid MCP
Ccom.myncellium.paid/paid-mcpNo reviews yet
Pay-per-call MCP tools over x402 (USDC/Solana): LLM, utilities, x402 market and model prices.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Myncellium Paid MCP (69/100 against 55). Myncellium Paid MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.
| agent-device | Myncellium Paid MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 4.7k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 17 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |