Head to head
agent-device vs aml
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps
Full listing
No reviews yet
Screen a payee address before an AI agent pays: sanctions, mixers, scam lists, on-chain risk.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours aml (89/100 against 55). aml is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.
| agent-device | aml | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.7k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 134 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-08-20 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |