Mmcp.market

Head to head

agent-device vs ironclaw

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

agent-deviceio.github.callstack/agent-device
C
No reviews yet

MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps

Full listing
ironclawio.github.IronSecCo/ironclaw
B
No reviews yet

Sandboxed shell exec for MCP clients: run untrusted agent commands in a gVisor container.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ironclaw (70/100 against 55). agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.

 agent-deviceironclaw
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100B70/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars4.7k19
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

agent-device vs ha-mcpagent-device vs IWEagent-device vs fiori-mcp-serveragent-device vs mcp-local-ragagent-device vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers