Head to head
agent-device vs DidWork
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps
Full listing
No reviews yet
Verify that an agent's claimed outcome actually happened, using independently gathered evidence
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours agent-device (94/100 against 80). agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.
| agent-device | DidWork | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.7k | 1 |
| Downloads / week | 118k | 96 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 1 | 8 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |