Head to head
agent-device vs Coolant
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for mobile app automation: verify, control, and debug iOS, Android, TV, and desktop apps
Full listing
No reviews yet
Instruments for what a model cannot know on its own: time, randomness, DNS, hashes, receipts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Coolant (67/100 against 55). Coolant is hosted and callable through the gateway; agent-device runs on your own machine. agent-device has noticeably more public adoption.
| agent-device | Coolant | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 4.7k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 28 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |