Head to head
Google Maps MCP Server vs Video History Project
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
18 Google Maps tools for AI agents — geocode, search, directions, weather, and more.
Full listingVideo History Project
Corg.videohistoryproject/researchNo reviews yet
Search experimental video history, read public records, follow sources and export citations.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Google Maps MCP Server (83/100 against 69). Video History Project is hosted and callable through the gateway; Google Maps MCP Server runs on your own machine. Google Maps MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Google Maps MCP Server | Video History Project | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 459 | – |
| Downloads / week | 3.2k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |