Head to head
DBHub vs Football Database and Results
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Token-efficient database MCP server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite
Full listing
No reviews yet
Historical football results, teams, competitions and draw/streak statistics via 10 read-only tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DBHub (85/100 against 60). Football Database and Results is hosted and callable through the gateway; DBHub runs on your own machine. DBHub has noticeably more public adoption.
| DBHub | Football Database and Results | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | New |
| GitHub stars | 3.5k | – |
| Downloads / week | 21k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |