Head to head
MCP vs H/M Article 50 Transparency Builder
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Crypto derivatives data: funding, open interest, liquidations, options, ETF flows. Free account key.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Free Article 50 website scanner, notice builder, and checksum verifier. No key or payment.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (83/100 against 60). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | H/M Article 50 Transparency Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | – |
| Downloads / week | 581 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |