Head to head
SSH Manager vs Cybercentry Verification
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SSH server management for agents, with per-server read-only and allowlist security modes
Full listing
No reviews yet
Twelve tools: token, wallet, contract and site security. Two free, the rest $1 in USDC over x402.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cybercentry Verification (89/100 against 74). Cybercentry Verification is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH Manager runs on your own machine. SSH Manager has noticeably more public adoption.
| SSH Manager | Cybercentry Verification | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 484 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 617 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 12 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-08-22 |
| Category | Security | Security |