Head to head
MCP vs ScrapeNest
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Butterbase MCP server — manage your backend: schemas, auth, functions, storage, RAG, deploys.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web search, scraping, RAG answers with citations, and translation as MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (96/100 against 67). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | ScrapeNest | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A96/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 3.7k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-27 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |