Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent-Native Dispatch vs Obsidian Turbocharged

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent-Native Dispatchio.github.BuilderIO/agent-native-dispatch
A
No reviews yet

Central Slack/Telegram router with jobs, memory, approvals, and A2A delegation

Full listing
Obsidian Turbochargedio.github.The-40-Thieves/obsidian-tc
B
No reviews yet

Model-agnostic, agent-ready Obsidian MCP server with RBAC, SLSA provenance, and native search.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Dispatch (98/100 against 83). Agent-Native Dispatch is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obsidian Turbocharged runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Dispatch has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent-Native DispatchObsidian Turbocharged
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA98/100B83/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars4.9k5
Downloads / week–694
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—3
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—AGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-19
CategoryProductivityProductivity

Other comparisons

Agent-Native Dispatch vs WorkfileAgent-Native Dispatch vs SlackAgent-Native Dispatch vs lociAgent-Native Dispatch vs ExomemAgent-Native Dispatch vs AgentpackAll Productivity servers