Head to head
Agent-Native Content vs Obsidian Turbocharged
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Obsidian Turbocharged
Cio.github.The-40-Thieves/obsidian-tcNo reviews yet
Model-agnostic, agent-ready Obsidian MCP server with RBAC, SLSA provenance, and native search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Content (98/100 against 65). Agent-Native Content is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obsidian Turbocharged runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Content has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent-Native Content | Obsidian Turbocharged | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.9k | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 694 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |