Head to head
Agent-Native Analytics vs Security Scanner
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Security Scanner
Cio.github.vpatser1/mcp-server-security-scannerNo reviews yet
Scan MCP configs for 30+ CVEs, prompt injection, tool poisoning; validate OAuth configs
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Analytics (98/100 against 55). Agent-Native Analytics is hosted and callable through the gateway; Security Scanner runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Analytics has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent-Native Analytics | Security Scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 4.9k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | 23 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |