Mmcp.market

Head to head

Agent-Native Analytics vs Codexbox

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent-Native Analyticsio.github.BuilderIO/agent-native-analytics
A
No reviews yet

Agent-Native Amplitude/Mixpanel - connect data sources, prompt for charts

Full listing
Codexboxio.github.psyb0t/codexbox
A
No reviews yet

Self-hosted MCP server: run OpenAI Codex CLI prompts and manage workspace files.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Analytics (98/100 against 88). Agent-Native Analytics is hosted and callable through the gateway; Codexbox runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Analytics has noticeably more public adoption.

 Agent-Native AnalyticsCodexbox
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA98/100A88/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars4.9k0
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—WTFPL
Last release2026-09-192026-09-14
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Agent-Native Analytics vs Ts CoreAgent-Native Analytics vs ImageAgent-Native Analytics vs DatawrapperAgent-Native Analytics vs MaginaryAgent-Native Analytics vs prompt-protectionAll AI and agents servers