Head to head
Agent-Native Analytics vs mcpm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcpm
Bio.github.getmcpm/cliNo reviews yet
MCP security guard + package manager: trust-scored installs, blocks prompt injection and rug-pulls.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent-Native Analytics (98/100 against 83). Agent-Native Analytics is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcpm runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Analytics has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent-Native Analytics | mcpm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.9k | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 349 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 10 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |