Head to head
MCP Server Auth Template vs ThinkReview
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ThinkReview (98/100 against 88). ThinkReview is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server Auth Template runs on your own machine.
| MCP Server Auth Template | ThinkReview | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | Security | Security |