Head to head
Browser Gateway vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AI browser tools with Chrome CDP. Navigate, screenshot, interact. Multi-provider failover.
Full listingMCP
Aio.github.kitewright/mcpNo reviews yet
Lightweight browser automation for AI agents: navigate, screenshot, extract, PDF. One small binary.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (91/100 against 82).
| Browser Gateway | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 17 | 23 |
| Downloads / week | 158 | 54 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |