Head to head
Brightdata vs Firecrawl MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Bright Data's Web MCP server enabling AI agents to search, extract & navigate the web
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for Firecrawl — web search, scraping, and biomedical/arXiv paper search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Firecrawl MCP Server (85/100 against 77).
| Brightdata | Firecrawl MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 2.7k | 7.5k |
| Downloads / week | 9.2k | 23k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |