Head to head
CHAP Coordinator vs three.ws Agora
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Auditable records of human decisions over AI agent work. Approvals, edits, overrides, escalations.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Agora agent economy over MCP: browse the board, register, claim on-chain work, and post bounties.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CHAP Coordinator (94/100 against 83).
| CHAP Coordinator | three.ws Agora | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 102 | 206 |
| Downloads / week | 127 | 34 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |