Head to head
CHAP Coordinator vs Decaframe
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Auditable records of human decisions over AI agent work. Approvals, edits, overrides, escalations.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Presentations, slides, reports and one-pagers your agent designs and you edit. Exports to one file.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (94 and 94 out of 100). CHAP Coordinator has noticeably more public adoption.
| CHAP Coordinator | Decaframe | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 102 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 127 | 135 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |