Head to head
Kepler CRM vs Pipedrive MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search recruiting CRM records, manage candidates, jobs, pipelines, notes and tasks with OAuth.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Full Pipedrive CRUD plus a local SQLite pipeline copy: stale deals, forecasts, aging, dupes, rep
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pipedrive MCP (75/100 against 67). Kepler CRM is hosted and callable through the gateway; Pipedrive MCP runs on your own machine. Pipedrive MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Kepler CRM | Pipedrive MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 41 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |