Mmcp.market

Head to head

Google Ads Transparency Center Scraper vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Google Ads Transparency Center Scraperio.github.brenton-keller/google-ads-transparency-center
C
No reviews yet

Google Ads by domain or brand: creatives, formats, dates; or bulk-check which domains advertise.

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SSH — policy-gated remote access (83/100 against 67). Google Ads Transparency Center Scraper is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Google Ads Transparency Center ScraperSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Google Ads Transparency Center Scraper vs Azure MCP ServerGoogle Ads Transparency Center Scraper vs SemioticGoogle Ads Transparency Center Scraper vs World MonitorGoogle Ads Transparency Center Scraper vs NetdataGoogle Ads Transparency Center Scraper vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers