Head to head
Brave Search vs Wikipedia
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Brave Search MCP Server: web results, images, videos, rich results, AI summaries, and more.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search Wikipedia, read summaries and full text, target sections, find nearby pages, list languages.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Wikipedia (93/100 against 85). Wikipedia is hosted and callable through the gateway; Brave Search runs on your own machine. Brave Search has noticeably more public adoption.
| Brave Search | Wikipedia | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A93/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.5k | 3 |
| Downloads / week | 17k | 396 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |