Head to head
Bowmark vs mcp-grafana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Do things on live websites: prices, availability, quotes, bookings, anything behind a form or login.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-grafana (98/100 against 87). mcp-grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| Bowmark | mcp-grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 3.5k |
| Downloads / week | 145 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |