Head to head
Shield vs Caf
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Shield
Aio.github.bolyra/shieldNo reviews yet
Stdio MCP auth proxy: wrap any MCP server with per-tool permission enforcement.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for Caf — Brazilian KYC/KYB: face auth + liveness, document OCR, orchestrated onboarding
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Shield (91/100 against 82). Caf has noticeably more public adoption.
| Shield | Caf | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 271 |
| Downloads / week | 23 | 18 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-08-29 |
| Category | Security | Security |