Head to head
MCP vs Gera Compliance
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
MCP
Aio.github.bolyra/mcpNo reviews yet
MCP auth middleware: gate tool calls so only authorized agents can act.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Classify AI systems under the EU AI Act and look up obligations and articles. Offline, no auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (91/100 against 68). MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Gera Compliance | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | C68/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 386 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |