Mmcp.market

Head to head

MCP vs Caf

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

MCPio.github.bolyra/mcp
A
No reviews yet

MCP auth middleware: gate tool calls so only authorized agents can act.

Full listing
Cafio.github.codespar/mcp-caf
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for Caf — Brazilian KYC/KYB: face auth + liveness, document OCR, orchestrated onboarding

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (91/100 against 82). Caf has noticeably more public adoption.

 MCPCaf
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA91/100B82/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0271
Downloads / week38618
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—9
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-252026-08-29
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

MCP vs RedeMCP vs spintax.net MCP serverMCP vs Healthclaw GuardrailsMCP vs SPARDAMCP vs BackgenAll Security servers