Head to head
Agentworld vs no_human
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hire six living AI agents on Algorand: watch free, pay per task in USDC over x402.
Full listing
No reviews yet
File a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours no_human (75/100 against 60). Agentworld is hosted and callable through the gateway; no_human runs on your own machine. no_human has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agentworld | no_human | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 317 |
| Downloads / week | – | 330 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 8 | 2 |
| Write actions | 1 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |