Head to head
Arxiv vs Hipocampo MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search arXiv papers, download full text, semantic search, citation graphs, and alerts via MCP.
Full listingHipocampo MCP
Cio.github.carrasquelalex1/hipocampoNo reviews yet
Bilingual dual memory with SSC for AI agents. Semantic search, embeddings, profiles.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Arxiv (92/100 against 57). Hipocampo MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Arxiv runs on your own machine. Arxiv has noticeably more public adoption.
| Arxiv | Hipocampo MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 3.2k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 37 |
| Write actions | — | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |